The US authorities has intervened to argue that its “critically necessary,” that its views are heard when a Dublin court docket raises questions over the legality of information transfers between the EU and the US with the European Court docket of Justice.
By submitting your private data, you agree that TechTarget and its partners might contact you relating to related content material, merchandise and particular gives.
The Irish Excessive court docket ruled on third October that the EU Court docket of Justice ought to determine on the validity of Standard Contractual Clauses (SSCs) – extensively utilized by companies to share information with the US – following a case introduced by the Irish Data Commissioner towards Fb and Austrian lawyer Max Schrems.
The case has doubtlessly enormous implications for billions of Euros value of EU-US commerce and the info privateness rights of tens of millions of EU residents, and their security and safety, Justice Caroline Costello wrote in a 152 page judgement revealed this week.
The US authorities’s transfer is the most recent twist in an extended working authorized problem, initially introduced by Austrian lawyer Max Schrems, towards Fb in 2013 which succeeded in bringing down the EU-US Safe Harbour agreement two years later.
In a listening to within the Dublin court docket right now, Eileen Barrington, representing the US authorities, stated the US had reviewed this week’s judgement and had some “points” with the best way it described US regulation.
The Dublin court docket will submit a sequence of inquiries to the EU Court docket of Justice (CJEU) on the validity of EU-US information sharing clauses, as soon as they’re agreed by the events within the case.
Barrington instructed the court docket that the US was anxious to have its views on the questions heard to make sure that their description of US regulation is “factually correct.”
She stated she was involved that the Irish Knowledge Safety Commissioner, Helen Dixon, appeared to take the view that that the US authorities was not a celebration to the proceedings earlier than the CJEU.
It’s “critically necessary” that the US authorities’s views are taken into consideration in finalising the questions, she stated.
Michael Collins, representing the Irish Data Commissioner, stated there must be no makes an attempt to “re-litigate the matter,” however agreed that factual errors court docket be corrected.
Attorneys for the Data Commissioner – and Fb and Schrems who’re defendants within the case- will try to agree on the wording of questions for the European Court docket, he stated.
It might be tough sufficient for all three events to agree the wording and might be “subsequent to inconceivable” if each celebration joined to the case – which embrace Digital Europe, the Enterprise Software program Alliance, and the Digital Privateness Centre – took half of their drafting.
Justice Caroline Costello, listening to submissions right now, stated that the three events ought to attempt to agree questions, however might share the drafts with the opposite joined organisations, who might then give their views to the court docket.
The choose will make the ultimate determination, she stated.
Paul Gallagher, representing Fb, stated the corporate is contemplating interesting towards the Dublin court docket’s determination to refer EU-US information sharing to the European Court docket. The corporate deliberate to “leapfrog” the Court docket of Attraction and go on to the Supreme Court docket.
The Supreme Court docket, would have the ultimate say whether or not to listen to the case, he stated.
Learn Extra concerning the Dublin authorized ruling on EU-US information transfers
A High Court judge in Dublin has requested the Court docket of Justice of the EU to determine on the validity of EU-US information transfers, in a case that would have implications for commerce between the EU and the US, and the privacy of millions of EU residents.
Businesses face new uncertainty over their ability to share data with the US, as Europe’s highest court docket reassesses the legality of the EU’s mannequin data-sharing contracts.
The European Court of Justice declares the Safe Harbour framework invalid as a mechanism to legitimise transfers of private information from the EU to the US
Irish data protection commissioner Helen Dixon neatly avoids having to cope with the US surveillance of Facebook users in Europe by referring a criticism by Austrian lawyer Max Schrems to the European Court docket of Justice